<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ERISA Benefits Tech — Insights</title>
    <link>https://erisabenefitstech.com/blog/index.html</link>
    <atom:link href="https://erisabenefitstech.com/blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Writing on using AI in employee benefits practice — where it helps, where it fails, and how to tell the difference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>ERISA Benefits Tech, LLC</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Four ways general-purpose AI gets ERISA wrong</title>
      <link>https://erisabenefitstech.com/blog/2026-07-01-four-ways-general-ai-gets-erisa-wrong.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://erisabenefitstech.com/blog/2026-07-01-four-ways-general-ai-gets-erisa-wrong.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <category>Perspective</category>
      <description>Off-the-shelf AI is fluent in ERISA in the abstract and unreliable the moment your specific plan matters. The gap is predictable, it has four shapes, and only three of the four are closable by the tool alone.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
